Evelyn Müller
Scheuerilch eine Pöre,ich würde…
Scheuermilch eine Pöre,ich würde abraten,was füher gut wahr ist heut für die Mülltonne…Geldgier !!!
BÄR BEL
Geldgieriger Laden
Ist leider Trend das jede Firma nur noch auf Geld aus ist bei gleichzeitig sinkendem Qualitätsniveau. Gerne wird der Inhalt klein gemacht und/oder kosten gespart mit lächerlicher Qualität. Klingt schön wie es über die Jahre hieß “neue Verbesserte Rezeptur” etc während diese minderwertige Scheuermilch nur noch Präejakulat Konsistenz hat. Verwässerter, billigster Schrott. Als ich noch klein war, hatte die Marke Qualität. Es war dickflüssig und man konnte richtig die rauen Partikel in der Scheuermilch tasten. Man konnte sparsam damit umgehen. Während es jetzt absichtlich auf hohen Verbrauch ausgelegt ist für mehr Gewinn. Diese Firma pfeift also auch auf die Umwelt.
Reinhard Werner
Anstatt damit die Scheiben sauber zu…
Anstatt damit die Scheiben sauber zu bekommen,hat man danach richtig Probleme die streifen wegzubekommen.
Bonneville
Scheuermilch Citrus
macht was sie soll
Below are the analyze and conclusion of us about above reviews
Review 1: Evelyn Müller
This review, titled “Scheuerilch eine Pöre,ich würde…”, expresses strong dissatisfaction with the product. The user claims the product was once good but is now only fit for the trash. The phrase “Geldgier!!!” (greed) suggests the user believes the company is prioritizing profit over quality. The tone is highly negative and critical, indicating a significant drop in perceived product quality. This review focuses more on subjective experience and perceived company motives than specific details about usage. The review’s brevity makes it difficult to fully assess the user’s reasoning.
Review 2: BÄR BEL
This review, titled “Geldgieriger Laden” (Greedy Shop), provides a more detailed critique of the product and the company. The user claims there’s a trend of companies prioritizing profit over quality. They note a decline in the product’s consistency, describing it as having a “pre-ejaculate consistency” and being watered-down. They reminisce about the past quality of the product, when it was thick and contained noticeable abrasive particles. The user accuses the company of deliberately designing the product for high consumption to increase profit, suggesting disregard for the environment. This review is longer and gives specific details about the product’s current state compared to its past quality, suggesting the user is familiar with the product.
Review 3: Reinhard Werner
This review, titled “Anstatt damit die Scheiben sauber zu…”, is a very short and direct complaint. The user states that instead of cleaning surfaces, the product leaves streaks that are difficult to remove. This suggests a failure of the product to perform its primary function. The review is simple and straightforward, focusing on a specific negative experience.
Review 4: Bonneville
This review, titled “Scheuermilch Citrus”, is the only positive review in the provided set. The user simply states that the product “does what it should.” This suggests that the product met the user’s expectations and performed its intended function effectively. The review’s brevity makes it impossible to determine the specific context or usage scenario.
www.viss.de likely legit, but with product quality concerns
Note: The above statement is just my personal opinion, you should check carefully at the sources and make the right decision for yourself.