Moon Fr
Très bonne agence réactive rien à dire…
Très bonne agence réactive rien à dire j’ai obtenu mon visa Dubaï en 24 heures.
Matheo
J’ai demander un visa pour la Chine
J’ai demander un visa pour la Chine, les prix sont vraiment raisonnable pour le service qu’ils procurent, ils connaissent trés bien leur domaine merci encore !!
ANIS ANIS
J’ai consulté simplement leur site et…
J’ai consulté simplement leur site et avant de faire ma commande de visa pour les Émirats j’ai eu une personne aimable au téléphone qui m’assurer! Service sérieux
Francis B.
C´est des voleurs
C´est des voleurs, pour un visa pour un pays du Caucase ou de l´Asie centrale, ils vous demandent le double du prix d´un visa électronique demandé directement dans le pays souhaité, et de plus cela dure deux fois plus longtemps. Des arnaqueurs à fuir comme de nombreuses agences non officielles.
David Morin
Service parfait de A à Z
Service parfait de A à Z. Des vrais professionnels.
Muss Fr
Parfait rien à dire visa reçu dans les…
Parfait rien à dire visa reçu dans les temps. Merci !
alexandre
parfait service irréprochable
delugeau
Annulé
Dans l’impossibilité de fournir certain documents, se solde par un remboursement au bout de un mois.
Edit: quand on prend un visa il n’indique pas clairement la liste des documents necessaires. ça se solde par l’impossibilité d’avoir le visa souhaité. ils ont tenté de compter des frais pour minimiser le remboursement. Je tiens a noter que le remboursement à été rapide suite à la publication d’un avis ici !
Below are the analyze and conclusion of us about above reviews
Review Analysis – Moon Fr
This review is extremely positive, stating “Très bonne agence réactive rien à dire j’ai obtenu mon visa Dubaï en 24 heures.” (Very good responsive agency, nothing to say, I got my Dubai visa in 24 hours). The brevity and enthusiastic tone could be seen as slightly suspicious, but the specific mention of a Dubai visa and a 24-hour turnaround adds a touch of credibility. It lacks specific details about the process, which is a common characteristic of both genuine and fake reviews. However, it’s a positive data point overall.
Review Analysis – Matheo
Matheo’s review expresses satisfaction with the service for obtaining a Chinese visa. The user mentions that the prices are “vraiment raisonnable” (really reasonable) for the service provided and that the company knows their domain well. This review includes specific details about the visa type (China) and touches on the value proposition (reasonable price), increasing its perceived authenticity. The lack of specific details is a slight negative but overall, it seems a legitimate positive experience.
Review Analysis – ANIS ANIS
This review details a positive pre-purchase interaction. The reviewer mentions consulting the website and receiving helpful assistance over the phone regarding a visa for the Emirates. The phrase “Service sérieux” (Serious service) suggests a feeling of trust and confidence. While it doesn’t describe the entire visa process, the mention of a phone conversation and a specific destination (Emirates) lends some credibility to the review. It sounds like a real experience with customer service.
Review Analysis – Francis B.
Francis B.’s review is a strongly negative one, calling the company “voleurs” (thieves). The reviewer claims the prices are double what one would pay for an electronic visa directly from the destination country, specifically mentioning countries in the Caucasus or Central Asia. The reviewer also claims the process takes twice as long. This level of detail, including the geographical regions and price comparison, makes the review appear more authentic. Negative reviews are crucial in evaluating a service, and the specificity here gives it weight. The “arnaqueurs à fuir comme de nombreuses agences non officielles” (scammers to avoid like many unofficial agencies) is a strong accusation.
Review Analysis – David Morin
David Morin’s review is short and extremely positive: “Service parfait de A à Z. Des vrais professionnels.” (Perfect service from A to Z. Real professionals). While positive, its brevity and lack of detail make it less convincing. It is the kind of generic positive review that could be easily fabricated. It doesn’t provide any specific information about the service or the visa obtained, making it less reliable than other more detailed positive reviews.
Review Analysis – Muss Fr
Similar to David Morin’s, Muss Fr’s review is short and positive: “Parfait rien à dire visa reçu dans les temps. Merci !” (Perfect nothing to say visa received on time. Thank you!). It’s slightly better than David Morin’s because it mentions receiving the visa “dans les temps” (on time), suggesting a reliable service. However, the lack of specific details about the visa type or destination makes it less convincing than other more detailed positive reviews.
Review Analysis – alexandre
This review only contains the title “parfait service irréprochable” (perfect irreproachable service). The complete lack of a body makes it nearly useless for assessment. It provides no context or details, making it impossible to verify its authenticity. It is easily the least credible of all the reviews.
Review Analysis – delugeau
delugeau’s review is a mixed one, initially negative but later edited with a more positive outcome. The reviewer initially complained about unclear document requirements leading to cancellation and attempted fee deduction during the refund process. However, they later noted that the refund was processed quickly after they posted the initial review. This suggests that the company is responsive to negative feedback, which is a positive sign. The specific details about document requirements and the refund process increase the review’s credibility, making it a valuable data point despite the initial negative experience.
www.visaoffice.fr likely legit, but exercise caution
Note: The above statement is just my personal opinion, you should check carefully at the sources and make the right decision for yourself.