Written by the company
Pakistan’s most trusted travel company providing seamless online bookings. Access the guaranteed lowest airfare on domestic and international flights on 100+ airlines. Avail massive discounts on top of Guaranteed Lowest Airfares. Experience world-wide visa assistance, get bank discounts on visa booking with a 95% success rate. Enjoy reliable customer support. Earn cashback and YUGO rewards.
Saqlain Haider
Yugo is best agency for travelling…
Yugo is best agency for travelling around the world especially for Umrah.
Mishal Sharafat
Good services of yugo company
Good services of yugo company
Sohrab Malik
Good servise
Azeem Rehmat
Bakwas company he ye advance lefty Hain…
Bakwas company he ye advance lefty Hain pher Kam Bhi Sahi Nahi karty October me invitation tha or appointment November k Di JB refund Ka kha to in Ka CEO NY kha k Jo Karna he Kar lo bhot he battamez log hn ye
Aleem Ahmed
Pathetic service
Pathetic service, unprofessional behavior, and took a long time to complete my file.
Below are the analyze and conclusion of us about above reviews
The first entry is not a review, but rather a marketing blurb from the company itself. It highlights features such as guaranteed lowest airfare, visa assistance, reliable customer support, cashback, and YUGO rewards. This is typical marketing language and should not be considered an unbiased review. It aims to entice customers with promises of savings and excellent service. Since it is from the company, it is inherently biased and designed to promote the company’s services.
Review 1 (Saqlain Haider): This review is extremely short and lacks detail. “Yugo is best agency for travelling around the world especially for Umrah.” While it’s a positive sentiment, it doesn’t provide any specific reasons why Yugo is the “best” or any details about the user’s experience. The brevity and lack of specifics make it difficult to assess its authenticity. It could be a genuine positive experience, but it could also be a fabricated review designed to boost the company’s image. The lack of detail makes it less credible.
Review 2 (Mishal Sharafat): Similar to the previous review, this one is also very short: “Good services of yugo company”. It offers no specifics about what services were good or why the reviewer had a positive experience. This lack of detail makes it highly suspect. Reviews that simply state “good service” without any supporting information are often viewed with skepticism, as they can be easily generated. It does not offer any real substance that helps establish its validity.
Review 3 (Sohrab Malik): This review only consists of “Good servise”. This is even shorter than the previous reviews, offering even less information and making it even less credible. Its extremely short length and lack of detail make it almost impossible to determine authenticity. It has no practical value in evaluating the legitimacy of the company.
Review 4 (Azeem Rehmat): This review is negative and provides some details. “Bakwas company he ye advance lefty Hain pher Kam Bhi Sahi Nahi karty October me invitation tha or appointment November k Di JB refund Ka kha to in Ka CEO NY kha k Jo Karna he Kar lo bhot he battamez log hn ye” (Translation: “This is a rubbish company, they take advance payment and don’t do the work properly. There was an invitation in October and an appointment was given in November. When asked for a refund, their CEO said to do whatever I want, they are very rude people.”) This review is significantly more detailed and provides specific complaints: taking advance payment, not completing work properly, scheduling issues, and rude customer service. The detail adds credibility because it sounds like a genuine negative experience. The mention of the CEO’s response increases the perceived likelihood of this being an authentic review.
Review 5 (Aleem Ahmed): This negative review states “Pathetic service, unprofessional behavior, and took a long time to complete my file.” While still somewhat brief, it offers more specific complaints than the generic positive reviews. The mention of “unprofessional behavior” and “took a long time to complete my file” gives more context than simply stating “bad service.” This makes it more credible than the very short positive reviews, although it is still less detailed than Review 4. However, the inclusion of specific issues faced by the customer makes the review more realistic.
YUGO.pk likely a mixed bag of experiences, caution advised.
Note: The above statement is just my personal opinion, you should check carefully at the sources and make the right decision for yourself.