Relocation to Canada Reviews | Check if relocation2canada.com is scam or legit?

Written by the company

Relocation to Canada is an immigration consultancy agency in Toronto, Canada. We provide all-in-one consultancy services to help our clients achieve their Canadian dream in the simplest way possible. This is possible with a team of regulated consultants who are highly trained to provide an A to Z immigration assistance.
Move to Canada with #RelocationToCanad
a Top Experts!


Divine Howell

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

My Dreams

I dislike they said I could do an follow up when im ready to start back the process but havent gotton a feedback since .


Vjekoslav Car

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

You called me

You called me, and that was good. I couldn’t answer, so I was on a job. I would like to proceed, but I am unsure how successful I could be considering my age.


GIACOMO SOLIMENE

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Great fast services fast response


Marko Subotic

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

It is a scam!!!!!!

It is a scam!!!!!!
Simply because the legal agreement is against the client who is signing it. Once they collect the money, they lose all the interest and stall the case with all sort of different excuses. + Based in Bulgaria, but off-shore agency in Canada. Doesn’t sound fishy at all. When you ask for a refund, because they broke all the possible responsibilities, they act a fool and saying they had to fire a lawyer to process the papers. What papers when you didn’t even found a job position that is mandated for visa submission? Only then you actually need to reach out to lawyer or whoever you find to pretend to be the one, and then the papers are getting processed. COMPLETE SCAM!


haileselassie bisrat

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

I made community change through…

I made community change through professional skill on treating patients on health facilities and Hospitals in the Tigray region-Ethiopia, typically nursing care during patient management, and outbreak investigation and management skills.


Dudu Dube

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Patient and Informative

Patient and Informative


Michele Dampara

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

don’t know how serious a company it is

don’t know how serious a company it is
because some things are not clear to me about the work visa free food and accommodation for the first month at the expense of the Canadian government


Tanka Rai

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Truth talking & good skim to convince…

Truth talking & good skim to convince to clint.


Consumer

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Very professional and knowledgeable.


Irene Dochi

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

SCAMMERS

This company has collected 7050 euro from me to process my documents and visas fees but after paying they later call and tell me to come and rate them 5 stars at trust pilot so that they will facilitate all my documents and visas ASAP which I did but they never fulfil their promises and when I call they never return my call.
They are scammers


Uroš Božanić

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Useful information

I was contacted immediately and was offered useful information on relocation to Canada.


Bogdan Podar

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Good

Nice conversațional


Giorgi

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I just need to relocat in canada,

I just need to relocat in canada,


Norman Erak

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Happy with candian attitude

I thought Jason was very helpful


boncoeurfrantz

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

my experience was great beacause i was…

my experience was great beacause i was able to comunicate with the person and we both understood each other.


Gianmarco Piccirillo

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

The woman i talked to through the phone…

The woman i talked to through the phone was really polite and managed to explain everything very carefully.


Peter Eustace

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Excellent Service

Excellent Service


David

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Courteous and Professional Service

The representative was courteous, friendly and professional


Hadees Mohammad

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I need bit more time to think about it

I need bit more time to think about it


Nenad

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

What we expect in Canada and how long we need adaptive period

Excellent experience


Below are the analyze and conclusion of us about above reviews

The company description provided by Relocation to Canada highlights their services as an all-in-one consultancy for Canadian immigration, emphasizing a team of regulated consultants offering comprehensive assistance. This self-promotional content is typical for a company introducing itself, but it lacks independent verification and should be taken with a grain of salt. There is no tangible feedback here, so it serves only as marketing material.

Divine Howell: This review expresses dissatisfaction with the lack of follow-up after being told they could resume the process later. The user reports not receiving any feedback since their initial contact. This suggests a potential issue with customer service and communication, which, while not definitively indicative of a scam, raises concerns about the company’s responsiveness and follow-through. It highlights a breakdown in the promised service.

Vjekoslav Car: This review indicates initial contact from the company, which was perceived positively. However, the user expresses uncertainty about their chances of success due to their age. This review is neutral in that it neither praises nor condemns the company. It mainly reflects the user’s personal concerns and a potential need for further reassurance from the company.

GIACOMO SOLIMENE: This review offers high praise with the comment “Great fast services fast response,” but lacks specifics. While positive, the brevity and lack of detail make it difficult to assess the validity or depth of the experience. It could be a genuine positive experience or a superficial comment.

Marko Subotic: This review is extremely negative, labeling the company a “scam.” The user alleges that the legal agreement favors the company, and that after payment, the company stalls the case with excuses. They claim the company is based in Bulgaria but operates offshore in Canada, which the user finds suspicious. The user further accuses the company of being uncooperative when a refund is requested, citing a fabricated story about firing a lawyer. This review contains serious allegations of fraudulent behavior and strongly suggests a negative experience.

haileselassie bisrat: This review seems completely unrelated to the services of an immigration consultancy. It describes the user’s experience as a healthcare professional in Ethiopia. It’s likely this review was mistakenly posted on the wrong platform, rendering it irrelevant to assessing the company’s credibility.

Dudu Dube: This review simply states “Patient and Informative.” While positive, it’s too brief to provide substantial insight into the quality of the company’s services. It lacks specific details about the experience, making it difficult to assess its authenticity or helpfulness.

Michele Dampara: This review expresses uncertainty about the legitimacy of the company, questioning claims of free food and accommodation provided by the Canadian government for work visa holders. This suggests the company might be making promises that sound too good to be true, which can be a red flag. The user’s skepticism is warranted, as government-sponsored benefits of this nature are rare.

Tanka Rai: This review uses vague language, stating “Truth talking & good skim to convince to clint.” The term “skim” is concerning, as it can imply deceptive practices. The overall sentiment is ambiguous and raises questions about the company’s transparency and ethical standards.

Consumer: This is a very short and positive review, stating “Very professional and knowledgeable.” Like other brief positive reviews, it lacks specifics and doesn’t provide enough information to evaluate its credibility or the actual service experience.

Irene Dochi: This review is highly negative, labeling the company as “SCAMMERS.” The user claims to have paid 7050 euros for document processing and visa fees. They allege that the company requested a 5-star rating on Trustpilot in exchange for expediting the process, but then failed to deliver on their promises and stopped responding to calls. This is a serious accusation that aligns with the other negative reviews.

Uroš Božanić: This review mentions being contacted and offered “useful information on relocation to Canada.” This suggests a positive initial interaction and the provision of helpful advice. However, it doesn’t describe the outcome of the consultation or any further engagement with the company.

Bogdan Podar: This review simply states “Nice conversațional.” It’s a brief and positive comment, but lacks any substantive details about the service or the user’s overall experience.

Giorgi: This review states “I just need to relocat in canada,” which seems more like a statement of intent than a review of the company’s services. It doesn’t offer any information about the user’s experience with Relocation to Canada.

Norman Erak: This review expresses satisfaction with a specific individual, Jason, stating he was “very helpful.” While positive, it’s focused on a single interaction and doesn’t provide a comprehensive assessment of the company’s overall services.

boncoeurfrantz: This review highlights good communication, stating “my experience was great beacause i was able to comunicate with the person and we both understood each other.” Effective communication is important, but this review lacks details about the quality of the advice or the outcome of the service.

Gianmarco Piccirillo: Similar to other positive reviews focused on initial interactions, this review praises the politeness and clarity of the explanation provided by a phone representative. However, it doesn’t offer insight into the overall effectiveness of the service.

Peter Eustace: This review simply states “Excellent Service,” without providing any context or details. Its brevity makes it difficult to assess its credibility or value.

David: This review describes the representative as “courteous, friendly and professional,” which is a positive assessment of the customer service. However, it doesn’t provide information about the outcome of the service or the user’s overall satisfaction.

Hadees Mohammad: This review states “I need bit more time to think about it,” indicating that the user is still in the decision-making process and hasn’t yet fully engaged with the company’s services. Therefore, it doesn’t provide any relevant feedback about the company’s performance.

Nenad: This review expresses a desire for information about expectations in Canada and the adaptation period, stating “Excellent experience.” This seems premature considering the context, suggesting the experience was potentially just an initial consultation.

Relocation to Canada likely a SCAM

Note: The above statement is just my personal opinion, you should check carefully at the sources and make the right decision for yourself.

Leave a Reply