Jodie
Avoid this company – DAYLIGHT ROBBERY
The UK Visa was approved extremely quickly. However, be aware that this is a third party site and the processing fees charged are exceptionally high. A colleague who I am travelling with used a different site and her visa cost ~$34 (Australian); also issued in less than 3 hours. I used ivisatravel and was charged $198 (ie almost 6 times as much). Despite contacting the company apparently I am not eligible for a refund.
Stefan Ritsch
Express took 3 days
I paid for a an express, 1hr turn around. Cost me more than EUR300. It took them more than three days and they never provided a refund. My recommendation would be not to use them at all, an if, only go for cheap option. Fasttrack is a scam. Also very poor customer service. Had to follow up 30 times.
Julia Ehrstrand
scammers
scammers! Do not use this service!!!! To pass UK immigration you need an ETA, which you can apply on the government website and get it within minutes for only £19 (is straight forward). IVISA charged me almost £100 for it!!
JUAN PABLO AYALA
Fraudulent and scammers
Fraudulent and scammers! To pass UK immigration you need an ETA, which you can apply on the government website and get it within minutes for only £19 (is straight forward). IVISA charged me almost £100 for it!!
Total Scammers!
Frank
Check government websites to find out whether you actually DO need a VISA. Their advice seems to be untrustworthy.
They say, contrary to government website that Dutch Citizens need a VISA to enter China, which is not true if you stay less than 15 days, which they conveniently do not mention on their website, likely to make money of people who then order a visa thru them.
Below are the analyze and conclusion of us about above reviews
Analysis of Jodie’s Review:
This review highlights a significant price discrepancy for visa processing. Jodie states that ivisatravel.com charged her $198 AUD for a UK visa, while a colleague obtained the same visa for approximately $34 AUD through another site. Both visas were reportedly issued quickly. Jodie explicitly identifies ivisatravel.com as a third-party site, implying that the high cost is due to inflated processing fees. The inability to obtain a refund despite the cost difference further contributes to the negative sentiment. This review suggests the website isn’t necessarily a scam in the traditional sense (as the visa was approved), but that it employs a business model that relies on charging significantly higher fees than alternative options, potentially preying on those who may not be aware of cheaper alternatives. The user’s statement shows a clear comparison, which increases the credibility of the review, because she made clear a site who charge cheaper.
Analysis of Stefan Ritsch’s Review:
Stefan Ritsch’s review focuses on the failure to deliver on a promised “express” service. He paid over €300 for a 1-hour turnaround but experienced a delay of more than three days. The lack of a refund and poor customer service, requiring 30 follow-ups, amplify the negative experience. The user specifically calls the “Fasttrack” service a scam. This review points towards potential issues with service reliability and customer support. The explicit mention of the “Fasttrack” service being a scam is direct and indicates dissatisfaction with a specific offering of the company. The large price point is clearly stated, further adding to the user’s frustration and the review’s overall impact. It is a bad experience about what the company provide.
Analysis of Julia Ehrstrand’s Review:
Julia Ehrstrand’s review is brief but direct, labeling ivisatravel.com as “scammers.” She claims that the website charged her almost £100 for a UK ETA (Electronic Travel Authorization), which she says can be obtained directly from the government website for only £19 within minutes. The stark price difference and the assertion that the official process is straightforward strongly suggest that ivisatravel.com is charging exorbitant fees for a service that can be easily and cheaply obtained elsewhere. The direct use of the term “scammers” demonstrates a high level of dissatisfaction and a belief that the company is intentionally deceiving customers. Her review also shows the correct official price, so the review can be believable.
Analysis of JUAN PABLO AYALA’s Review:
This review mirrors Julia Ehrstrand’s experience, repeating the claim that ivisatravel.com charged almost £100 for a UK ETA that can be obtained for £19 on the government website. The reviewer uses the terms “Fraudulent and scammers!” and “Total Scammers!” which suggests a belief that the company is actively engaging in deceptive practices. The repetition of the exact figures and scenario from the previous review lends further weight to the accusation that ivisatravel.com is significantly overcharging for a service. The concise and emphatic language reinforces the negative sentiment. The strong and repetitive language shows the upset experience.
Analysis of Frank’s Review:
Frank’s review focuses on potentially misleading advice provided by ivisatravel.com regarding visa requirements. He claims that the website incorrectly states that Dutch citizens need a visa to enter China for stays less than 15 days, contrary to information on the government website. Frank suggests that this misinformation is intentional, designed to encourage people to purchase visas through ivisatravel.com unnecessarily. This review highlights a concern that the company may be prioritizing profit over providing accurate and reliable information, which could lead customers to incur unnecessary expenses. This is a very negative experience because it shows the website is untrustworthy.
ivisatravel.com likely scam.
Note: The above statement is just my personal opinion, you should check carefully at the sources and make the right decision for yourself.