E Visa Reviews | Check if e-visa.co.uk is scam or legit?


Sam

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

EXCELLENT

EXCELLENT! Easy to apply. Intuitive online system and fast results. I’m impressed 👍🏻


Shiraz Kabani

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Simple and Efficient Process

Simple and Efficient Process

It took just a few minutes and was quite easy to do. The approval came back within 24-48 hours.


customer

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

E- visa

Just did my application last week and the following week has been successful approved, only few days.


Customer Mr M Johanson

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

excellent service

easy to fill in excellent feedback and when mistake made , and quick turnaround


Judith Russell

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Excellent

Excellent, prompt and efficient service- well done


Jas

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Excellent service

Excellent service, was kept posted an visa delivered on time.


CathyWarren

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Ease of use and good service and…

Ease of use and good service and communication


RICHARD CASTLE

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Easy and straight forward.


Jane Davis

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Easy form to complete

Easy form to complete for someone who is not good with tech. Clear instructions so easy to use.


JR

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Very quick and efficient service

Easy site to navigate and plenty of warnings to check accuracy of entries before submission. Appreciated the updates on the processing of the visas and the overal quick turnaround. I also received a response to my e-mail question within 24 hours as promised.


Martin Wilson

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Quick and efficient.


V frost

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Very prompt service

Very prompt service, very happy


Frazer Broomby

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

VISA’S ARE FREE – DO NOT USE

This is an un necessary website – clearly intended to catch out the unwary VISA’S ARE FREE ON THE AUSTRALIAN Govmt WEBSITE. DO NOT USE THIS WEBSITE


Nick

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Third time of use of E-visa (London)…

Third time of use of E-visa (London) and within three (3 ) hours both my wife’s & my
own visa were returned completed after submitting dates, scanned passport photos, all on a simplified form online. At reasonable cost also.
Highly recommended.


Bim

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Satisfied customer

I completed my application this was a standard form, on a Friday, i was contacted by Saturday via email that the picture was blurry, so then i tried to re-uploaded it, but was struggling to get the correct spec. So tried again on Sunday and by Monday morning i had my e-visa. Simple as that!, i gave it 3 Stars as i feel the website can do with some improvements. Thank you Visa Team 🙂


Les B

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Applied for Visa and still waiting

Applied for Visa and still waiting. Tried emailing and they sent automated email. Then tried ringing their office in London, only got automated answer machine (in office hours) then it hung up on me.
Should have seen the signs ie Dear Sir/Madam when they know my name.


Lauren Robinson

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I applied for a Visa on the official…

I applied for a Visa on the official government website, it was approved, then this website told me it was “revoked.” They made me stress for the entire morning, only to find that my VISA was just fine. Don’t interact with this website.


Tiffany Evans

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Fake and free on the gov website!


Joe Viner

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Do not use

Do not use, it’s a scam posing as a government site


John C

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Look for the official Govt Websites

Whilst applying online for a visa to Cambodia, I noticed that it charged $99 and, for a further $25, e-visa would register me with the British Embassy. I smelled a rat and went back to the Search Engine. E-visa was not the government website that I thought it was and when I went to the official one and applied and it was approved within 36 hours for a cost of $36. E-visa is for the gullible – avoid them.


Below are the analyze and conclusion of us about above reviews

The reviews for e-visa.co.uk present a mixed picture, leaning towards caution. Here’s a breakdown:

* **Sam:** This review is short, positive, and uses generic praise like “EXCELLENT!” While not inherently suspicious, the lack of specifics makes it less trustworthy. It could be a legitimate positive experience, but it also fits the profile of a potentially fabricated review intended to boost the site’s rating. The use of a thumbs-up emoji is common in less sophisticated reviews.

* **Shiraz Kabani:** Similar to Sam’s review, this one uses simple, positive language (“Simple and Efficient Process”). The mention of a 24-48 hour approval timeframe adds a bit more credibility, as it’s a specific detail. However, it’s still quite brief and lacks depth, which is a common characteristic of potentially inauthentic reviews.

* **customer:** This review is brief and only states that their application was approved within a few days. It doesn’t provide much detail about the process or the website’s usability. The lack of specifics raises some questions about its authenticity.

* **Customer Mr M Johanson:** This review praises the feedback and quick turnaround time, mentioning a mistake that was corrected. This is a slightly more detailed positive review, suggesting a potentially genuine experience. Mentioning correction of a mistake is a good indication.

* **Judith Russell:** Again, a short and generic “Excellent” review. While positive, it lacks any real substance or specific details that would make it more believable. It simply praises the prompt and efficient service.

* **Jas:** This review is slightly better, as it mentions being kept posted and the visa being delivered on time. This provides a bit more context than the extremely brief reviews, lending it slightly more credibility.

* **CathyWarren:** Very short and general (“Ease of use and good service and communication”). Lacks specifics and is therefore difficult to verify.

* **RICHARD CASTLE:** Exceptionally short and lacking in any detail. This makes it inherently suspicious as a genuine customer review.

* **Jane Davis:** This review focuses on the form being easy to complete, even for someone not tech-savvy. This is a specific detail that adds some credibility. The mention of “clear instructions” further strengthens the review’s authenticity.

* **JR:** This review is more detailed, praising the easy navigation, warnings about accuracy, updates on processing, and quick turnaround. The mention of a response to an email within 24 hours adds further credibility. This review seems more genuine due to its specificity.

* **Martin Wilson:** Very short and offers no useful details to make an assessment.

* **V frost:** This review is short and positive, praising the prompt service. However, it doesn’t provide any specific details about the experience. The lack of specifics makes it less trustworthy.

* **Frazer Broomby:** This is a very strong negative review, claiming that visas are free on the official Australian government website and warning others not to use the site. This review directly alleges that the site is unnecessary and potentially a scam. This is a serious accusation that significantly damages the site’s credibility.

* **Nick:** This review claims to be a third-time user and mentions quick visa completion (within 3 hours), simplified form, and reasonable cost. The specific details make it more believable, and the repeat usage claim adds weight. However, the speed of processing described could be a red flag if it’s unusually fast compared to official channels.

* **Bim:** This review describes a problem with a blurry photo and the subsequent efforts to re-upload it. The mention of contact via email and the timeline of events add credibility. The rating of 4 stars and the suggestion for website improvements also contribute to the review’s perceived authenticity.

* **Les B:** This is a negative review describing a delayed visa, lack of customer service response, and automated responses. The mention of “Dear Sir/Madam” when the company knows the name is a red flag. This review raises serious concerns about the site’s reliability and customer support.

* **Lauren Robinson:** This is a very strong negative review, claiming that the website falsely reported a visa revocation after it was approved on the official government website. This accusation is extremely damaging and suggests the website may be intentionally misleading users.

* **Tiffany Evans:** Short and directly calling the website a fake and claiming it is available for free on the goverment website

* **Joe Viner:** Direct accusation of being a scam posing as a government site.

* **John C:** This review details an experience where the reviewer realized the website was charging significantly more than the official government website and offering unnecessary services. This review explicitly calls the website a scam targeting the gullible.

e-visa.co.uk likely a scam

Note: The above statement is just my personal opinion, you should check carefully at the sources and make the right decision for yourself.

Leave a Reply