Written by the company
AtoZee Visas is a team of experienced immigration consultants who have all the answers to your immigration-related queries. AtoZee Visas provide all-around solutions about visa services (such as PR, Student, Business, and others) to various countries such as Canada, the UK, the USA, Germany, Australia, etc.
Cheruku saikumar
Never trust this person
Never trust this person, he does not do any work for money, he will provide you fake documents, all the editors are done by his employees.
Suresh Singh
Biggest froud in delhi
Sujata Singh
⚠️ Warning
⚠️ Warning: Fraud Alert – Stay Away from This Company
This company is running a scam. They take full payment from clients with false promises and stop responding once they get the money. A woman named Akshita, claiming to be an immigration lawyer (and wife of the owner), contacts clients to demand more money using fake stories.
As a former employee, I experienced constant pressure to make sales based on lies. They gave false and incomplete information during hiring. I resigned on November 16, 2024, and they still haven’t paid my October salary despite repeated follow-ups through calls, messages, and emails. They keep giving new dates and then go silent.
They fake company documents, lie about their staff size (they say 50+ but only 10–12 work there), and mostly target international or less-educated clients to scam them.
The people involved are:
Tarun (Owner), Akshita (Wife of the Owner), and Aarti (Accountant).
❌ Do not trust this company – they scam both clients and employees.
These people ask their employees to post positive reviews and pay them for it. They also tell them that the more reviews they get from their friends, the more money they will be paid. New employees are asked to post a review as soon as they join.
Yogita
⚠️ Warning
⚠️ Warning: Fraud Alert – Stay Away from This Company
This company is running a scam. They take full payment from clients with false promises and stop responding once they get the money. A woman named Akshita, claiming to be an immigration lawyer (and wife of the owner), contacts clients to demand more money using fake stories.
As a former employee, I experienced constant pressure to make sales based on lies. They gave false and incomplete information during hiring. I resigned on November 16, 2024, and they still haven’t paid my October salary despite repeated follow-ups through calls, messages, and emails. They keep giving new dates and then go silent.
They fake company documents, lie about their staff size (they say 50+ but only 10–12 work there), and mostly target international or less-educated clients to scam them.
The people involved are:
Tarun (Owner), Akshita (Wife of the Owner), and Aarti (Accountant).
❌ Do not trust this company – they scam both clients and employees.
These people ask their employees to post positive reviews and pay them for it. They also tell them that the more reviews they get from their friends, the more money they will be paid. New employees are asked to post a review as soon as they join.
Ahmed Khan
Most scammer of the world
Most scammer of the world
Jo apne baap ka nhi huaa wo aapka kya hoga
SUJOY BHATTACHARJEE
BIGGEST SCAMMERS IN THE WORLD
They scammed me very badly and take my 2L Rupees and do nothing. Akshite is the most bigges scammer in those people. Is always bagging for money and money and do nothing. Most uneducated poor people’s.
Abhishek kumar
Most fraud company in delhi
Most fraud company in delhi
Ashima Ahuja
Steer clear of this agency
Steer clear of this agency
Avoid making the same error that I did! It’s not certain, but their consultants lie and say they will send invitations in 4-6 months. You won’t receive an invitation after more than 1.6 years of waiting. Refund requests are only handled following application denial.
Consultants vanish after being paid, and the business says they’ve resigned or are on leave. There are no promises or refunds offered.
Take caution and resist their manipulations. If you really must utilise them, obtain a written guarantee on official letterhead that details the precise date of invitation receipt.
Don’t make the same error I did!
Update: They’ll say that unfavourable reviews are phoney and were paid for by other businesses. Never trust their justifications!”
Swapna
They are fraudsters
It’s over a year since I registered with them for Canadian PR for myself and my husband. Was promised PR with waiting period of 5-8 months by Dilpreet Kaur…..then Akshita the CEO initially took CAD 2780/- from me. Akshita shared a fake job opportunity with me extracted another CAD 2000 in October 2023 and a further CAD 3,400 in November 2023. Thankfully did not accede to her demand for another CAD 5000 on false promise of an LMIA that would lead to a temporary work visa that would be converted into a PR. Also separate Rs 17,700 was paid to her colleague Adel for attestation of my certifications in September 2023….till date it is not attested…he keeps postponing without appropriate proofs of even submitting to WES. Now neither Dilpreet neither Tarun or Akshita are replying to my texts….as I contacted them as I still do not have any visa from Canada till date.
Also this so called experienced Akshita is not even aware of the Insurance limits that are required to apply for a work permit and she has gone silent since then. Always pretending to be busy or sick when we have any enquiries and becomes active and demands money citing an urgency as if PR will be issued in just a few days.
They had initially promised me refund of administration fees if PR is not done in a year’s time. Are not responding to my refund request either. This has lead me to believe that the entire team of AtoZee Visas are fraudsters
Approximate total of Rs 5,36,000 of our hard earned money has been swindled by this team.
So please be extra careful before approaching them.
Please get in touch with me on Swapna- 00918180856960 . I will share their detailed modus operandi of fooling genuine visa and PR seekers
Neeraj Kumar
Scammer don’t trust on him
Harpreet Singh
Fraudulent immigration advisors are…
Fraudulent immigration advisors are Atozee Visas. They will make up stories about how your profile will be chosen within six months and about giving you your money back, but as soon as they have it, they stop working on your file and stop returning calls. They won’t tell you that you have to pay them back after the year is up either. They put you in a precarious situation only to steal your money.
Dr.Sana khan
Great experience.
Great experience.
Really polite and helpful staff .
Highly recommended❤️
Iam arslan
Extraordinary service 👍🏻
Gitanjali Gupta
Top-notch consultancy with clear and…
Top-notch consultancy with clear and helpful guidance. Highly satisfied!
sufiyan akhtar
What I like ?
What I like ?
Environment !
Friendly and professional staff. My visa approval was hassle-free.
Lovejit Kahlon
Do not trust at All In This fake…
Do not trust at All In This fake compnay …..They Will take your Money and send fake pdf version documnets ….Must search you tube videos about thier comapny ….Both are are their relative and they made video To
promote them ….:After seeing My previous reviews
Tarun called me started shouting. …Saying that he is loosing business. …My question is that then you should do My proper process with honesty not to do fraud with me and why My ILETS score got expired and you said your file
is In The Pool later when i checked It was not there …..You arranged fake Job For us With 7000 salry House and every thing and when we called To that company and
nothing was there …..
Tarun Ji committed Raho….You said i paying rest refund and i deleted The comment
With that trust …Now you are saying we have answer of your comments . Please Write me here and Ask
me what answer you have and let everyones knows The answer .
Varun Arora
Great Company
Great Company
Intellectual Staff
I applied for Canada PR process my visa got rejected due to my negative Medical report and they were very supportive but in the end they did provided me with the refund within the timeline
Thank you so much Mr. Tarun & Adil
Monika Verma
Great experience.. Just go for it
Great experience.. Just go for it..
URMIMALA BHARALI
A trustworthy and dedicated Visa consultancy
Thank You AtoZee visas Consultancy for giving us a Hand in our Visa Application.. The whole team are very hard working in terms of information gathering from us.. They were much motivated than us, in putting up this application possible for me and for my family as well.. They give us right direction to make our dream to be come true and continue more in the future.. I know that they were much pressured than us while fixing all the requirements and paper works before lodging our visa.. but all in all they were legit and worth trusting people and their Company, because they didn’t fail us in our Visa approval.. Thank You so much
Hanare Hatake
Polite and experienced consultants.
Below are the analyze and conclusion of us about above reviews
Analysis of “Written by the company” review: This is clearly promotional content directly written by AtoZee Visas. It presents a highly positive, idealized view of the company, emphasizing their experience and comprehensive service offerings. It lacks any specific details or personal experiences that would lend it credibility. The purpose is purely marketing-oriented, designed to attract potential clients. As such, it offers no independent verification of the company’s legitimacy. The lack of specifics makes it a low-value piece of information for assessing credibility.
Analysis of “Cheruku saikumar” review: This is a highly negative review, rating the company with 1 out of 5 stars. The reviewer claims “Never trust this person” and alleges that the company provides fake documents and that employees do the editing. The review lacks specific details about the services received or the nature of the fake documents. While the strong negative sentiment is noteworthy, the lack of concrete evidence makes it difficult to fully assess its validity. The vagueness diminishes its credibility, although it warrants attention in the context of other negative reviews.
Analysis of “Suresh Singh” review: This review consists of a single, strongly negative phrase: “Biggest froud in delhi.” It provides no context, specific examples, or details about the reviewer’s experience. Due to the extreme brevity and lack of supporting information, it’s difficult to assess the validity or significance of this review. While the sentiment is clearly negative, the absence of any substance makes it a low-value data point for determining the company’s legitimacy.
Analysis of “Sujata Singh” review: This review is a simple warning: “Fraud Alert – Stay Away from This Company.” The review provides a very concise statement of strong negativity without any supporting details or specific experiences. Like the previous review, this brevity makes it difficult to assess the validity or weight of the claim. While the warning is concerning, its lack of substance limits its usefulness in determining the company’s credibility.
Analysis of “Yogita” review: This review is a duplicate of the “Sujata Singh” review and carries the same message and limitations. It raises a warning about a fraud alert and instructs readers to stay away from the company. Since it is the same text, my analysis is the same as well. It provides no context, specific examples, or details about the reviewer’s experience. Due to the extreme brevity and lack of supporting information, it’s difficult to assess the validity or significance of this review.
Analysis of “Ahmed Khan” review: This review expresses extreme negativity, calling the company the “Most scammer of the world.” The additional statement is culturally specific and doesn’t provide concrete information. The review lacks specifics, making it difficult to verify the claims. The strong language, while indicative of a negative experience, requires further context to be properly assessed.
Analysis of “SUJOY BHATTACHARJEE” review: This review alleges a significant financial loss (2 Lakh Rupees) due to the company’s inaction. It specifically names “Akshite” as a scammer and criticizes the company’s education and professionalism. The review provides a monetary figure, which is a concrete detail, but it still lacks specifics on the exact services promised and why they were not delivered. The mention of a specific individual and the amount lost add weight to the claim, making it a more valuable piece of information than the simpler negative reviews.
Analysis of “Abhishek kumar” review: This review simply states, “Most fraud company in delhi.” Similar to other brief negative reviews, it lacks details or specific experiences to support the claim. Its value in assessing credibility is limited due to the absence of any substantive information.
Analysis of “Ashima Ahuja” review: This review offers more detailed feedback than many of the others. It accuses the company of lying about invitation timelines for visa applications. It also alleges that consultants become unresponsive after payment and that refund requests are only handled after application denial. The reviewer advises others to get a written guarantee and warns against trusting the company’s justifications for negative reviews. This review provides specific allegations (lying about timelines, consultants vanishing, refund issues) and a warning based on personal experience, making it a relatively strong indicator of potential issues.
Analysis of “Swapna” review: This review is highly detailed and provides a substantial account of negative experiences. It names specific individuals (Dilpreet Kaur, Akshita, Adel, Tarun) and alleges multiple instances of fraudulent activity, including fake job opportunities and demands for additional payments. The reviewer claims to have lost a significant amount of money (Rs 5,36,000). The level of detail, the naming of individuals, and the financial figures make this a powerful negative review. The willingness to share contact information further suggests the reviewer’s sincerity. This review is a strong indicator of potential fraudulent behavior.
Analysis of “Neeraj Kumar” review: This is a short negative review. It provides no context, specific examples, or details about the reviewer’s experience, making it a low-value data point. The warning is concerning, its lack of substance limits its usefulness in determining the company’s credibility.
Analysis of “Harpreet Singh” review: The review accuses AtoZee Visas of making false promises about profile selection and refunds, and then failing to deliver after receiving payment. The reviewer claims the company stops working on the file and avoids returning calls. The specifics regarding false promises and lack of follow-through strengthens the review and increases its negative validity.
Analysis of “Dr.Sana khan” review: This review offers a positive experience with the company. It highlights polite and helpful staff and recommends the company. While the positive sentiment is encouraging, the review lacks specific details about the services or outcomes. Because of this, the review is difficult to determine the validity of the review.
Analysis of “Iam arslan” review: This review offers a positive experience with the company calling it an “Extraordinary service”. While the positive sentiment is encouraging, the review lacks specific details about the services or outcomes. Because of this, the review is difficult to determine the validity of the review.
Analysis of “Gitanjali Gupta” review: The review calls the consultancy Top-notch and highlights clear and helpful guidance. While the positive sentiment is encouraging, the review lacks specific details about the services or outcomes. Because of this, the review is difficult to determine the validity of the review.
Analysis of “sufiyan akhtar” review: The reviewer highlights the environment and friendly, professional staff, and claims their visa approval was hassle-free. This is a positive review. While the positive sentiment is encouraging, the review lacks specific details about the services or outcomes. Because of this, the review is difficult to determine the validity of the review.
Analysis of “Lovejit Kahlon” review: This review is heavily negative, accusing the company of being fake, providing fake documents, and engaging in fraudulent activities. The reviewer mentions a specific incident involving a fake job offer and accuses “Tarun” of shouting after seeing previous reviews. The reviewer says he got promised a refund which never happened. This negative review includes a good amount of detail, adding weight to the possibility of the company being involved in fraud.
Analysis of “Varun Arora” review: This review is extremely positive, contradicting many of the negative reviews. However, it says that his visa got rejected due to his negative Medical report. He also mentions that they provided him a refund within the timeline. The contradiction between this review and several other negative reviews makes it difficult to fully trust. However, it may be more reliable than the more vague positive reviews, since he stated his visa got rejected.
Analysis of “Monika Verma” review: This review is a brief, positive endorsement. It simply states, “Great experience.. Just go for it.” While positive, it lacks substance and specific details.
Analysis of “URMIMALA BHARALI” review: This review portrays a very positive experience, praising the company’s hard work, dedication, and success in achieving visa approval for the reviewer and their family. It highlights the team’s motivation and guidance. While it lacks explicit detail, it suggests the service was legit.
Analysis of “Hanare Hatake” review: The review says “Polite and experienced consultants.” While the positive sentiment is encouraging, the review lacks specific details about the services or outcomes. Because of this, the review is difficult to determine the validity of the review.
www.atozeevisas.com likely scam
Note: The above statement is just my personal opinion, you should check carefully at the sources and make the right decision for yourself.