Viso Reviews | Check if viso.software is scam or legit?

Written by the company

🚀 Welcome to VISO

– Step into the world of Ukrainian app development company specializing in JavaScript expertise. While we handle the technical intricacies of application creation, you can focus on propelling your business forward.

🤝 Our Approach:

– Our focus is on practical, cost-effective solutions that drive real results for our clients, without overpromising or underdelivering.

– Our belief is simple yet strong: Keep It Simple, Smart (K.I.S.S.). We focus on practicality and common sense in all decisions to provide solutions that suit you.

🌟 What Clients Say:

Even though we’re young, we work hard for excellence. Our happy clients show how much we care about doing good work. At VISO, we’re here to work hard and get the job done.

Let’s work together and make your vision come true, step by step.


Titus K.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Their approach and commitment to…

Their approach and commitment to excellence met our expectations, leaving us fully satisfied with the results. We can’t identify any areas that requires improvements.


Sung Park

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Great Technical Partners

I’ve been working with VISO for over a year now and they’ve been a great partner to work with. They’ve provided technical guidance, project management, and development. The main thing that I’ve found that makes VISO stand out from the various freelancers and agencies is their clear communication and honesty. You’d think these qualities would be a basic requirement, but I’ve found that it’s difficult to find and when you find it you hold on to it.


Rajath C

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Good service

Good service, very professional and friendly too.


Eugene Ostroukhov

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Fast learners and detail oriented

I reached out to the Viso team for help launching my project landing page. The site was built on Astro, a framework the team wasn’t familiar with at all. But they dove right in, got up to speed on the tech, and delivered the code we needed that fit all the metrics, such as performance and accessibility. The site’s now live and serving users!


Below are the analyze and conclusion of us about above reviews

The first review is written by the company itself. This is a common practice for businesses to introduce themselves and highlight their strengths. However, it’s crucial to remember that this information is inherently biased. While it’s good to see their stated values and approach, it should be taken with a grain of salt. The language used is promotional (“propelling your business forward,” “happy clients,” “make your vision come true”) and focuses on positive aspects only. There’s no mention of potential drawbacks or limitations. This self-promotional content doesn’t provide an objective assessment of the company’s services, and its credibility is low due to the obvious conflict of interest.

The second review, by Titus K., is very short and lacks specific details. It simply states that their expectations were met and that they are “fully satisfied,” mentioning that no improvements are needed. While a positive review, its brevity and lack of concrete examples make it difficult to assess its authenticity fully. It could be a genuine positive experience, but it could also be a fabricated review designed to boost the company’s reputation. The lack of specifics raises a slight red flag, making it difficult to consider this a highly credible source of information. It needs to be weighed together with other reviews to form an overall impression.

The third review, by Sung Park, is more substantial and provides some specific reasons for their satisfaction. They mention working with VISO for over a year and highlight their “technical guidance, project management, and development.” The reviewer also emphasizes VISO’s “clear communication and honesty,” which they found to be rare and valuable qualities. The review feels more genuine because it points to particular strengths and attributes that distinguish VISO from other service providers. While still very positive, the concrete examples provided lend more credibility to this review compared to the previous one. The length and specific observations help it appear more authentic.

The fourth review, by Rajath C, is very brief, stating only “Good service, very professional and friendly too.” Similar to Titus K.’s review, it lacks specifics and details, making it hard to gauge the reviewer’s actual experience. While positive, its brevity means it provides little substantive information about VISO’s capabilities or performance. The lack of concrete examples reduces its credibility and makes it difficult to assess its authenticity. It contributes minimally to forming a reliable judgment about the company.

The fifth review, by Eugene Ostroukhov, is quite detailed and persuasive. It describes a specific project where VISO helped launch a landing page built on Astro, a framework the team was initially unfamiliar with. The reviewer praises VISO’s ability to quickly learn the new technology and deliver code that met all required metrics. The specific details about the project, the technology involved, and the positive outcome significantly enhance the review’s credibility. This suggests a genuine experience and a positive interaction with the company, making this a more trustworthy review. The level of detail and the inclusion of technical specifics make this review a strong indicator of VISO’s capabilities.

viso.software likely legit

Note: The above statement is just my personal opinion, you should check carefully at the sources and make the right decision for yourself.

Leave a Reply