Written by the company
You take care of your trip, we take care of your visa
Jason Pei Lin Yu
Easy to use and swift
Javier Caponite Capitán
It’s one of the fastest and easier…
It’s one of the fastest and easier Evisas I have applied to.
Stefan
very fast process
very fast process
No Problems
Rute Louro
I took Evisa in 1 hour
Manfred Günter Spreen
It works perfect and Vera fast
It works perfect and Vera fast. Ty
Sharon A. M. Cleare
EVISA is Easy !!
The entire process was easy,straightforward & efficient.
Jan Staffan Tillander
Quick
Quick. Easily accessible. Clear instructions. Easy to use.
Celestin Ilunga Mukendi
I appreciate.Thankful.
Customer
Quick and easy
P. Conrad
Good experience.
Simple to use, fast.
Michiel
Doing this yourself is complex
Doing this yourself is complex and frustrating. Via a local company, I was ‘too late’, but via Evisa Express. all became simple and very much in time.
Guenter Max Mertins
Your reaction was very fast and we got…
Your reaction was very fast and we got our visa very quicky.
Luuk Pierre-Yves Jacobs-Rahari
Excellent
Efficient and fast
M. DABIRE Christophe
Scared and relieved
Was just scared after payment because I couldn’t attach documents, was wondering whether I wasn’t scammed. But I’m finally relieved and happy everything is done quick and well. Thank you very much
Claus Ignatius Schlosser
I was impressed with 16.05.2025 Your name (displaywith your quick response and the clear instruktions. It could be an examble for other services or administrations nower
I was impressed with your quick and clear procedures!!!
Vicki Chadwick
Good online application
Found the online process easy to follow & complete.
ALAIN CHUNG WEE
Efficient speedy process.
Litu kabir
Verry fast disition
Ian Paxton
Easy to navigate and complete.
Masoud Fakhri
war super Danke
war super Danke
Below are the analyze and conclusion of us about above reviews
The initial statement “You take care of your trip, we take care of your visa” is a marketing tagline and doesn’t contribute to a review analysis. It’s simply promotional content.
Review 1 (Jason Pei Lin Yu): This review is extremely brief, stating only “Easy to use and swift.” While positive, it lacks detail. Such a concise review could be genuine or fabricated easily. There’s no specific information to verify or refute its authenticity. The 5-star rating adds to the positive sentiment but doesn’t provide deeper insight.
Review 2 (Javier Caponite Capitán): This review, “It’s one of the fastest and easier Evisas I have applied to,” is also positive and focuses on speed and ease of use. While more informative than the first, it remains generic. The lack of context (e.g., which countries or previous experiences) makes it difficult to assess its legitimacy fully. It aligns with the service’s marketing but lacks unique details.
Review 3 (Stefan): The review “very fast process, No Problems” is very short and lacks specifics. It mirrors other reviews regarding speed and ease, making it potentially less trustworthy. The brevity and simplicity could indicate a lack of genuine experience or a potentially fabricated review.
Review 4 (Rute Louro): “I took Evisa in 1 hour” is extremely brief. This level of brevity is concerning because a genuine user might include more details about their experience, even if it’s positive. It’s too short to provide any meaningful insight or build trust.
Review 5 (Manfred Günter Spreen): “It works perfect and Vera fast. Ty” contains a minor grammatical error (“Vera” instead of “Very”). This could either indicate genuine non-native English use or poor writing in a fake review. The content still aligns with the “fast and easy” narrative, making it hard to differentiate from other potentially generic reviews.
Review 6 (Sharon A. M. Cleare): “The entire process was easy,straightforward & efficient.” This review echoes common themes. The use of “&” instead of “and” is a very slight quirk, but the statement remains generic and doesn’t give any specifics of the user’s experience.
Review 7 (Jan Staffan Tillander): Rated 4 stars. “Quick. Easily accessible. Clear instructions. Easy to use.” This review provides a bit more substance by mentioning “clear instructions.” The 4-star rating adds a touch of credibility, as it’s not a perfect score. However, it still relies on the general themes of speed and ease of use.
Review 8 (Celestin Ilunga Mukendi): “I appreciate.Thankful.” This review is extremely short and emotionally driven, but lacks any factual information. It’s difficult to assess the authenticity of such a brief and vague statement.
Review 9 (Customer): “Quick and easy” is another very short, generic, and unhelpful review. It offers no specifics and contributes little to assessing the credibility of the service.
Review 10 (P. Conrad): “Simple to use, fast” This continues the trend of short, positive reviews that focus on simplicity and speed. It provides no unique details or context.
Review 11 (Michiel): “Doing this yourself is complex and frustrating. Via a local company, I was ‘too late’, but via Evisa Express. all became simple and very much in time.” This review is more detailed and contrasts the service with doing it oneself or using a local company. This provides more context and specific benefits, making it more believable. The mention of being “too late” with a local company adds a layer of realism.
Review 12 (Guenter Max Mertins): “Your reaction was very fast and we got our visa very quicky.” This review focuses on speed (“very fast”) and uses slightly awkward phrasing (“very quicky”). This could point to non-native English or simply a rushed statement. It is consistent with other reviews but doesn’t stand out.
Review 13 (Luuk Pierre-Yves Jacobs-Rahari): “Efficient and fast” is a short and straightforward positive review. Like many others, it focuses on speed and efficiency, offering little unique information.
Review 14 (M. DABIRE Christophe): “Was just scared after payment because I couldn’t attach documents, was wondering whether I wasn’t scammed. But I’m finally relieved and happy everything is done quick and well. Thank you very much” This review stands out because it expresses initial concern and fear of being scammed. This is a more realistic and believable scenario. The subsequent relief and happiness after the process was completed successfully adds credibility, as it shows a journey from doubt to satisfaction. The specific issue of not being able to attach documents is a valuable detail.
Review 15 (Claus Ignatius Schlosser): “I was impressed with your quick and clear procedures!!!” This review is positive and emphasizes speed and clarity. The excessive use of exclamation marks can sometimes be a red flag, but it’s not definitive. The statement is similar to other positive reviews.
Review 16 (Vicki Chadwick): “Found the online process easy to follow & complete.” This is another positive review focused on ease of use. It doesn’t provide any unique details or context.
Review 17 (ALAIN CHUNG WEE): “Efficient speedy process.” This is a short, positive, and generic review that echoes the common themes of efficiency and speed.
Review 18 (Litu kabir): “Verry fast disition” (sic). This review is very short and contains a spelling error (“Verry” and “disition”). This could be due to non-native English or a rushed/fake review. The focus remains on speed.
Review 19 (Ian Paxton): “Easy to navigate and complete.” This review highlights the ease of navigation and completion, which is consistent with other positive reviews. However, it is still quite brief and lacks specific details.
Review 20 (Masoud Fakhri): “war super Danke” is a German phrase meaning “was great, thanks.” This shows a reviewer using a non-English language. However, this review is so short, it doesn’t add much to the credibility assessment.
evisa.express likely legit
While many reviews are short and generic, which raises some suspicion, there are a few that offer more specific details and realistic scenarios (like M. DABIRE Christophe’s review mentioning initial fear of being scammed). The consistency in praising speed and ease of use aligns with the service’s purported function. Without further investigation and cross-referencing with other sources, it’s difficult to definitively call it a scam. However, the volume of generic positive reviews should be a caution. It is more likely legitimate, but users should still exercise caution and conduct their own due diligence.
Note: The above statement is just my personal opinion, you should check carefully at the sources and make the right decision for yourself.