Written by the company
Visa to India. Fast, convenient and reliable India permission
citytax consultants
Excellent in each aspects
Arun Rai Arry
Good service here
VINOD Rajput
Very good service
Very good service
Ashwin Kelvin
Best experience with trustpilot
Shaurav Gusain
Amazing extra ordinary
Amazing extra ordinary
Mukti Karmakar
Very nice
Very nice , it’s so helpful
Chinnapareddy Rajashakarreddy
Noone
Excellent awesome
Shaibaaz Ansari
Nice experience nice service
Pradip Dalvi
It is realyy nice.
Shahid Fazil
Good and awesome
Good and awesome
Arsh shaikh
E visa will be provided in a period of…
E visa will be provided in a period of 60days
Kannan M
Nice
Nice and excellent website
Suyog Thakur
Good and awsome
Vaibhav Dhage
Gudguud
Gud
Atmosphere
Kishor Powar
It is nice working i am happy
Raman Deep
E visa will E visa will be granted for a period up to 60 days with double entry on e tourist visa and e business visa and triple entry on e medical visa.in the case of medical visa, extension may be g
E visa will be granted for a period up to 60 days with double entry on e tourist visa and e business visa and triple entry on e medical visa.in the case of medical visa, extension may be granted up to 60 months on case to case basis on merits of each case by the FRRO FRO concerned.
Consumer
Good and excellent
Good and excellent
Manas Barik
Great experience and Smooth processing.
Great experience and Smooth processing.
Amit Pandey
this is very trusted company
vaibhav deshmukh
Best experience
Below are the analyze and conclusion of us about above reviews
The review “Visa to India. Fast, convenient and reliable India permission” is clearly written by the company itself. It’s a promotional statement rather than a genuine customer review. It lacks the specifics and personal experience that a real review would contain. Therefore, it holds no value in assessing the credibility of the service and should be disregarded.
The review by “citytax consultants” giving a 1-star rating and titled “Excellent in each aspects” is highly suspicious. The title contradicts the 1-star rating, indicating a possible error, sarcasm, or a deliberate attempt to negatively impact the company’s rating. Without further context or details, this review is unreliable and difficult to interpret. It raises a red flag regarding the authenticity of the review system.
The review by “Arun Rai Arry” with a 5-star rating and titled “Good service here” is extremely brief and lacks any specific details. While a positive rating is favorable, the absence of explanatory text makes it difficult to gauge its sincerity. This type of review provides minimal insight into the quality of service and could be either genuine or easily fabricated.
The review by “VINOD Rajput” with a 5-star rating and titled “Very good service” accompanied by the text “Very good service” is another example of an overly simplistic review. It mirrors the previous review in its brevity and lack of substantial information. It’s hard to determine if this is a genuine customer experience or a superficial, potentially fabricated, positive reinforcement.
The review by “Ashwin Kelvin” with a 5-star rating and titled “Best experience with trustpilot” seems misplaced. It mentions “trustpilot” which is a review platform itself, implying the reviewer might be confused about where they are leaving the review. This casts doubt on the reviewer’s understanding or intent, making the review’s validity questionable in the context of this specific service.
The review by “Shaurav Gusain” with a 5-star rating and titled “Amazing extra ordinary” accompanied by the text “Amazing extra ordinary” suffers from the same problem as several previous reviews: it’s overly brief and lacks substance. While positive, the absence of any specific details about the experience makes it difficult to trust the sincerity or accuracy of the assessment.
The review by “Mukti Karmakar” with a 5-star rating and titled “Very nice” accompanied by the text “Very nice , it’s so helpful” is slightly more descriptive than some of the others, mentioning that the service was “helpful.” However, it still lacks specific details about what aspects were helpful, making it difficult to assess the true value of the review.
The review by “Chinnapareddy Rajashakarreddy” with a 5-star rating and titled “Noone” accompanied by the text “Excellent awesome” is peculiar. The title “Noone” is nonsensical, and while the descriptive text is positive, the odd title undermines the review’s credibility. This suggests a possible bot or someone not paying attention while posting.
The review by “Shaibaaz Ansari” with a 5-star rating and titled “Nice experience nice service” is another short, generic positive review. It lacks specifics and provides no real insight into the quality of the service provided. Like many of the other similar reviews, its genuineness is difficult to ascertain due to its brevity.
The review by “Pradip Dalvi” with a 5-star rating and titled “It is realyy nice.” is brief and contains a typographical error (“realyy” instead of “really”). This doesn’t automatically invalidate the review, but it does suggest a lack of attention to detail, making it slightly less trustworthy. Still lacks helpful specifics.
The review by “Shahid Fazil” with a 5-star rating and titled “Good and awesome” accompanied by the text “Good and awesome” is a prime example of a superficial and unhelpful review. It provides no valuable information and could easily be a fake positive comment.
The review by “Arsh shaikh” with a 5-star rating and titled “E visa will be provided in a period of…” accompanied by the text “E visa will be provided in a period of 60days” provides factual information but offers no judgment on the service. This review is more of an informative statement than a review of user experience, but is at least somewhat helpful.
The review by “Kannan M” with a 5-star rating and titled “Nice” accompanied by the text “Nice and excellent website” is another simplistic, positive statement. The focus on the “website” rather than the service raises a minor concern that this might be about the website’s design rather than the visa application experience itself.
The review by “Suyog Thakur” with a 5-star rating and titled “Good and awsome” mirrors many other reviews in its brevity and lack of detail. The misspelling of “awesome” doesn’t necessarily invalidate the review, but it does not contribute much to its credibility.
The review by “Vaibhav Dhage” with a 5-star rating and titled “Gudguud” accompanied by the text “Gud Atmosphere” is particularly unusual. The nonsensical title and extremely limited description make this review almost meaningless. It raises concerns about the legitimacy of the review process.
The review by “Kishor Powar” with a 5-star rating and titled “It is nice working i am happy” is slightly better than the one-word reviews as it mentions being “happy” with “working.” However, it’s still very vague and doesn’t offer specific reasons for the positive experience.
The review by “Raman Deep” with a 3-star rating and titled “E visa will E visa will be granted for a period up to 60 days with double entry on e tourist visa and e business visa and triple entry on e medical visa.in the case of medical visa, extension may be g” accompanied by the text “E visa will be granted for a period up to 60 days with double entry on e tourist visa and e business visa and triple entry on e medical visa.in the case of medical visa, extension may be granted up to 60 months on case to case basis on merits of each case by the FRRO FRO concerned.” is repetitive and appears to be copied information about visa details rather than a personal review. This raises serious concerns about the authenticity of the review and its relevance.
The review by “Consumer” with a 5-star rating and titled “Good and excellent” accompanied by the text “Good and excellent” is yet another generic, uninformative positive review that provides no specific details. This further contributes to the suspicion of potentially fabricated reviews.
The review by “Manas Barik” with a 5-star rating and titled “Great experience and Smooth processing.” accompanied by the text “Great experience and Smooth processing.” is more helpful as it hints at ‘smooth processing’. However, it still does not clarify on what aspects were smooth or what made the experience great.
The review by “Amit Pandey” with a 5-star rating and titled “this is very trusted company” is short but conveys trust. However, without further context, its impact is limited.
The review by “vaibhav deshmukh” with a 5-star rating and titled “Best experience” is brief. It tells it was the best experience but it is lacking specifics.
indian-evisa.org likely scam
Note: The above statement is just my personal opinion, you should check carefully at the sources and make the right decision for yourself.